Anyone Plan to Upgrade to Goldwing?

First topic message reminder :

Just checked their prices and even an 02's value w/ 35k miles is $10k.

IrishRob wrote:

Since I live in the Evergreen State also, albeit on the dry side, and also have a Goldwing and a Silverwing, I, too would be up for a meet and greet.

Rob

Next weekend there is a GWRRA gathering in kenniwick that I am considering attending. Do you belong to the gwrra?

Larry:

Yes I do belong to GWRRA and the local chapter here is "L"...we will be out of town taking a long overdue R&R at the lake. Maybe we can get together next time you head over the mountains.

Rob

HA, funny thread.

Silverwing is heavy.
Goldwing is vastly heavier.
If you want a light bike, get a 125 scooter.

Silverwing is a big bike.
Goldwing is a bigger bike.
If you want a small bike, get a 125 scooter.

Siverwing is powerful.
Goldwing is vastly more powerful.

Siverwing has limited gizmos
Goldwing has loads.

Silverwing is comfortable.
Goldwing is vastly more comfortable.

Silverwing is easy to mount.
Goldwing is easy to mount but not as easy as a SW

Silverwing is automatic.
Goldwing is not.

Silverwing is expensive.
Goldwing is vastly more expensive.
If you want a cheap bike, get a 125 scooter.

Silverwing has good handling, high and low speed.
Golding has better handling, high and low speed.
There are many, many other bikes with better handling than SW or GW.

I could go on.

I have the use of both a SW and a GW.
There is no comparison to which I believe is the better bike.
An automatic GW would be nice.

Don't get me wrong I think the SW is one of the best bikes made, but a SW is a toy compared to a GW.

Walt981 wrote:

HA, funny thread.

Silverwing is heavy.
Goldwing is vastly heavier.
If you want a light bike, get a 125 scooter.

Silverwing is a big bike.
Goldwing is a bigger bike.
If you want a small bike, get a 125 scooter.

Siverwing is powerful.
Goldwing is vastly more powerful.

Siverwing has limited gizmos
Goldwing has loads.

Silverwing is comfortable.
Goldwing is vastly more comfortable.

Silverwing is easy to mount.
Goldwing is easy to mount but not as easy as a SW

Silverwing is automatic.
Goldwing is not.

Silverwing is expensive.
Goldwing is vastly more expensive.
If you want a cheap bike, get a 125 scooter.

Silverwing has good handling, high and low speed.
Golding has better handling, high and low speed.
There are many, many other bikes with better handling than SW or GW.

I could go on.

I have the use of both a SW and a GW.
There is no comparison to which I believe is the better bike.
An automatic GW would be nice.

Don't get me wrong I think the SW is one of the best bikes made, but a SW is a toy compared to a GW.

Well written. Thank you.

PS.

Siverwing has good brakes.
Goldwing has phenomenal brakes.

I am talking about the GL1800, can't really comment on other Goldwings.

Walt981 wrote:

That is a great looking pair of bikes.

Seriously, a Goldwing has better low speed handling than a
Silverwing ?

At least I didn't have to take out a second mortgage to buy my
Silverwing

New GL1800's are running over $24k in my neck of the woods,
More if you want all the bells and whistles.

Why is there this constant need on here to compare a six cylinder manual geared motorcycle with a two cylinder automatic maxi scooter. My own view is that any sense of good taste and style you may have once possessed usually disappear when you become a Gold Wing owner. If you think I'm being the grumpy old git I most certainly am, just look at the way the owners 'customise' and spoil a good looking motorcycle.

What other motorcycle do you see that the owner has tarted up with acres of useless chrome tat, covers over the front disc brakes being a prime example and if you can fit a dozen coloured lights on them too, then so much the better. The flags, aerials, holders for everything from cold drinks to dentures, fluffy toys and furry seats, are bad enough, but the riders like to emblazon their Gold Wings with large fancy lettering calling themselves or their bikes "The Terminator" or something similar.

I don't think a Stealth version of a Gold Wing would sell.

surlybiker58 wrote:

Seriously, a Goldwing has better low speed handling than a
Silverwing ?

At least I didn't have to take out a second mortgage to buy my
Silverwing

New GL1800's are running over $24k in my neck of the woods,
More if you want all the bells and whistles.

HA, you don't realise how lucky you are.

GW UK price is £24,000 = $37,700
SW UK price is £6500 = $10,000

+1

Meldrew wrote:

Why is there this constant need on here to compare a six cylinder manual geared motorcycle with a two cylinder automatic maxi scooter. My own view is that any sense of good taste and style you may have once possessed usually disappear when you become a Gold Wing owner. If you think I'm being the grumpy old git I most certainly am, just look at the way the owners 'customise' and spoil a good looking motorcycle.

The comparison is simple:

Both motorcycles are made by Honda.
Both share a "wing" part of their name.
Both are bikes designed for old farts like yourself in mind.
Some of us have them both.

Some of us don't gaudy up the bike, we use some add ons to make the bike useful and personal for our own use.

I happen to like my coffee cup holder. I like my GPS and phone holder.

I can't say I don't care what you think, cuz I answered your post, but this is more of a commentary on your opinion. I enjoy riding what I ride regardless what you think of me or my bikes.

The Interstate model of the Goldwing is the stealth model. That is the model I searched out and purchased. I put 20,000 miles on the bike so far and the only thing I have had to do was change tires, oil and a set of brakes.

Both the Goldwing and the Silverwing are dependable and will be the majority of my stable hopefully for many years to come.

I thought you'd be along sooner or later to wave the flag for the Gold Wing, the last time I looked this forum was called silverwing600.com, and so not to confuse owners of the Honda GL500/650 Silver Wing motorcycle, there's usually a nice big picture of a Honda FSC/FJS Silver Wing scooter on the home page. Not a blinged up Gold Wing with a commode fitted below the licence plate

As for both being made by Honda and having Wing in the name, I think owners of the Honda Integra car and the new Integra scooter can realise they're totally different beasts.

I don't mind being called an old fart by you, but there's only 3 years in age between us, and it's you not me that has his GPS set up to find "adult entertainment".

Meldrew wrote:

I thought you'd be along sooner or later to wave the flag for the Gold Wing, the last time I looked this forum was called silverwing600.com, and so not to confuse owners of the Honda GL500/650 Silver Wing motorcycle, there's usually a nice big picture of a Honda FSC/FJS Silver Wing scooter on the home page. Not a blinged up Gold Wing with a commode fitted below the licence plate

As for both being made by Honda and having Wing in the name, I think owners of the Honda Integra car and the new Integra scooter can realise they're totally different beasts.

I don't mind being called an old fart by you, but there's only 3 years in age between us, and it's you not me that has his GPS set up to find "adult entertainment".

You could be right.

The original poster asked if there was anyone considering upgrading to a Goldwing. I don't think it is an upgrade. It is a different motorcycle entirely.... as you pointed out.

I am surprised that you are not on a Wing. You are an opinionated old fart, just like the rest of us old Wingers.

Had you ever rode one, you would have one. :not worthy:

Last time I looked it didn't say it was a "Goldwing Bashing Forum" It was a Silverwing 600cc Maxi forum.

We as forum members are very fortunate to have you as the gate keeper here.

larryinseattle wrote:

Had you ever rode one, you would have one.

I won't go quite as far as calling that a stupid statement, just ridiculous.

bigbird wrote:

larryinseattle wrote:

Had you ever rode one, you would have one.

I won't go quite as far as calling that a stupid statement, just ridiculous.

Your comment was a complete waste of key strokes! I mean a total waste.



There are some similar looks.

larryinseattle wrote:

bigbird wrote:

larryinseattle wrote:

Had you ever rode one, you would have one.

I won't go quite as far as calling that a stupid statement, just ridiculous.

Your comment was a complete waste of key strokes! I mean a total waste.

Thanks for letting me know.

larryinseattle wrote:

Had you ever rode one, you would have one.

I don't dispute the fact that the Gold Wing in all it's forms is a benchmark for comfortable touring motorcycles. Also you have to ride one to understand what the Gold Wing is all about. I've never criticised the motorcycle, just the laughable image that their owners portray, and for me I'd hate to buy one and turn into a typical owner.

All this "Wing-Ding" and "Treffen" lingo instead of rally and meeting, the need to haul more stuff than you need just to impress other GW owners, the desire to stand out and be noticed, the stuffed toys carried on the bike, the useless chrome bling, the whole image is rather silly, and that's just UK and European owners slavishly trying to look like their US counterparts.

Meldrew wrote:

larryinseattle wrote:

Had you ever rode one, you would have one.

All this "Wing-Ding" and "Treffen" lingo instead of rally and meeting, the need to haul more stuff than you need just to impress other GW owners, the desire to stand out and be noticed, the stuffed toys carried on the bike, the useless chrome bling, the whole image is rather silly, and that's just UK and European owners slavishly trying to look like their US counterparts.

I only haul what I need to stay on the road for as long as I want to be on the road. It is a personal choice.

This is how I roll on solo trips.

If that was me I'd leave at least half that stuff at home, do you really need heated gear in Arizona? Or another helmet, a cooler and kitchen set up, even a cot and folding chair. What's wrong with travelling light, a small tent, sleeping mat and sleeping bag, and a small stove to brew tea or coffee on. Your rain suit will add warmth if you're cold, and so does a breathable lightweight layer under your riding suit.

I'll bet your mate Steve has a large Gold Wing patch on the back of his leather waistcoat too.

larryinseattle wrote:

The original poster asked if there was anyone considering upgrading to a Goldwing. I don't think it is an upgrade. It is a different motorcycle entirely.... as you pointed out.

Most sensible statement of this whole debate.

Meldrew wrote:

If that was me I'd leave at least half that stuff at home, do you really need heated gear in Arizona?

larryinseattle does not live in Arizona, he traveled to Arizona from Seattle over the mountain passes.

My heated gear, can fold into a tiny zippered back which neither takes a lot of weight or space.

In fact it could be a life safer in unexpected very cold or very wet conditions when it difficult to maintain your temperature for extended riding.

Meldrew wrote:

Or another helmet

Since there is a huge difference in weather conditions ... it would be a personal choice.

Meldrew wrote:

a cooler and kitchen set up

It is not uncommon to bring cooler and kitchen set up ... if the person chooses to cook rather than eat out.

Meldrew wrote:

even a cot

It is not uncommon to bring personal comfort gear for sleeping, which is a personal choice.

If I am camping, I bring my thicker and longer Therm-a-rest pad.

Meldrew wrote:

folding chair.

If camping, I bring a tiny folding chair that sits about 9" above the ground.

Meldrew wrote:

What's wrong with travelling light, a small tent, sleeping mat and sleeping bag, and a small stove to brew tea or coffee on.

What gear to bring or not to bring is a personal choice, which based on many many factors.

I'm sorry I don't buy into that at all, the average Round The World rider doesn't take as much clutter as that along, look at that bike it's loaded up like a pack mule. Even the 3-6 month tours in South America organised by one UK company advise their mainly BMW GS riding customers to limit their personal kit to what they can fit into half of one of our supermarket carrier bags.

Camping is fine, but you live in the country that pioneered fast food, motels, and cheap hotel chains, so I'd say it's just another example of penny pinching, just like the car tyres that both you and larryinseattle are big fans of.

I used to motorcycle travel and stay in motels and eat in restaurants.

I bought the Goldwing to moto-camp. I carry all that I need because I can. My bike is my bike.... and I do what I want to do with it. I belong to a different forum called

http://www.motocampers.com/forums/index.php

It is full of moto-campers. We discuss doing exactly what I do with my Goldwing.

If one wants to set out across this country on a Silverwing and hotel and restaurant it... that would be their choice.

When I go two up, I pull this trailer:



Then the real creature comforts come along.... including my nightly squeeze.

Thank you Honda_Silver for explaining these things.

For some, it is quite obvious the intent. For others, they need a little coaching.

In June, I am traveling solo cross country to Baker City, Oregon for a motorcycle rally.... no camping gear. Motels and restaurants cuz I choose to.

In July we will be pulling the trailer to a few different camp grounds here in the Pacific Northwest.

In August, I am heading to Glacier National Park in Montana, moto-camping two up pulling the trailer.

In September, I am going solo-camping to the Northern California Redwoods with members of a different forum.... gasp, a Goldwing forum.

All different... all fun. Thanks for being concerned. At first, I thought I was nuts too, then after thinking about it, this all made good sense to me.

larryinseattle wrote:

Then the real creature comforts come along.... including my nightly squeeze.

You've got an inflatable doll too!

Meldrew wrote:

You've got an inflatable doll too!

I'm convinced.

When not on the Silver Wing and wanting to go a wee bit further -


I'll take the car. Less hassle and less emotive!

Meldrew wrote:

larryinseattle wrote:

Then the real creature comforts come along.... including my nightly squeeze.

You've got an inflatable doll too!

You have wit.... and are charming to boot. That is funny right there, I don't care who ya are.

However, I have a girl friend who makes high six figures and likes to ride on the back of this cheap asses Wing....

You figure that one out. Perhaps you are wasting your key strokes tossing this way....

larryinseattle wrote:

In June, I am traveling solo cross country to Baker City, Oregon for a motorcycle rally.... no camping gear. Motels and restaurants cuz I choose to.

Going from Washington into the neighbouring state of Oregon is hardly travelling cross country, we drove from Seattle to Portland via the Mount Rainier National Park in 2009, I have to say the Pacific Northwest is a great holiday destination.

Meldrew wrote:

Going from Washington into the neighbouring state of Oregon is hardly travelling cross country...................

You appear to have absolutely no understanding of the meaning of 'cross country'!

Walt981 wrote:

Meldrew wrote:

Going from Washington into the neighbouring state of Oregon is hardly travelling cross country...................

You appear to have absolutely no understanding of the meaning of 'cross country'!

What's your problem then, cross-country is across fields or countryside as opposed to roads or tracks. There's also cross-country running, biking, skiing or driving along a course along the countryside as as opposed to around a track. Or cross-country, meaning across a region or country not keeping to main or direct roads.

For example. I live in Cumbria very near to the Irish Sea, if I go West over to Northumberland, North Yorkshire, or County Durham and the North Sea coast there, I'll have gone cross-country. Going North, I'm heading for Dumfries and Galloway, and heading South it's down into Lancashire, more neighbouring counties than cross-country.

Meldrew wrote:

Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah.

I know every forum has 'the forum idiot'.
Are you it?

Walt981 wrote:

Meldrew wrote:

Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah.

I know every forum has 'the forum idiot'.
Are you it?

12 posts, most of which about the Gold Wing and you call one of the long serving members an idiot!!

Waspie wrote:

Walt981 wrote:

Meldrew wrote:

Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah.

I know every forum has 'the forum idiot'.
Are you it?

12 posts, most of which about the Gold Wing and you call one of the long serving members an idiot!!

Get your facts correct.
I have NOT called anybody an idiot?

Stop playing word games.

The intent was evident.

Waspie wrote:

Stop playing word games.

The intent was evident.

Oh I do apologise, I should have said, I know every forum has 'the forum idiots'.

Apparently someone who appears to be very new to this forum seems to think this forum is lacking a peckerhead and is working diligently to fill that void. Honestly, my dear man, we do not need anyone like that.

The Scootist wrote:

Apparently someone who appears to be very new to this forum seems to think this forum is lacking a peckerhead and is working diligently to fill that void. Honestly, my dear man, we do not need anyone like that.

Agreed.

Agreed here also !

Walt981



Welcome from Seattle!

There are many on this forum that agree with you but have been brow beaten to just not post anything.

Walt981 wrote:

Meldrew wrote:

Going from Washington into the neighbouring state of Oregon is hardly travelling cross country...................

You appear to have absolutely no understanding of the meaning of 'cross country'!

I explained the meaning of cross country so even you could understand me. larryinseattle lives in Washington state, and he said he was travelling to Baker City in Oregon which is the state south of Washington. It's a good days ride of about 370 miles, both states are in the Pacific Northwest.

If you thought he was inWashington, D.C. on the Eastern side of the US and travelling over to Oregon, then that's your mistake.

Meldrew wrote:

Blah, Blah, I Googled 'Cross Country', Blah, Blah.

Thank you for confirming your intelligence.

Hey Walt, you may not like this coming from your favourite forum idiot, but I looked at some more of the photos that you or the guy in the shades have taken of the Silver Wing, Gold Wing etc. There are a lot of quality and creative images there, and being honest I'd like to say I wish I could take photos like that, I really liked the way you've captured the image of the Silver Wing covered in rain drops.

Meldrew wrote:

Walt981 wrote:

Meldrew wrote:

Going from Washington into the neighbouring state of Oregon is hardly travelling cross country...................

You appear to have absolutely no understanding of the meaning of 'cross country'!

I explained the meaning of cross country so even you could understand me. larryinseattle lives in Washington state, and he said he was travelling to Baker City in Oregon which is the state south of Washington. It's a good days ride of about 370 miles, both states are in the Pacific Northwest.

If you knew the route I was taking, it would be 550 miles, and most of them mountain roads. I plan to be there for three days doing some of the local area "Hells Canyon Area" rides and then taking a 500 mile route back.

Sounds like a fun ride Larry. You should post some photos when you get back.

The Scootist wrote:

Sounds like a fun ride Larry. You should post some photos when you get back.

Thank you. I will post some. There will be plenty of "pirates" there as it is a Harley dominated event.... but I will be there with a few Wingers, BMW's and probably will throw in a Kawasaki and a Suzuki too.

Meldrew wrote:

Hey Walt, you may not like this coming from your favourite forum idiot, but I looked at some more of the photos that you or the guy in the shades have taken of the Silver Wing, Gold Wing etc. There are a lot of quality and creative images there, and being honest I'd like to say I wish I could take photos like that, I really liked the way you've captured the image of the Silver Wing covered in rain drops.

In April 2011 I rode my Wing from Seattle to Phoenix and back, two up pulling a trailer. 4500 miles by the time we were done.

In December 2011, I rode my bike from Seattle to Mission Tex and back. 2500 miles one way if you picked the easiest route. I didn't, I went to Los Angeles and turned left.... and followed the border all the way to Mission. I had 6500 miles on my odometer when I returned.

I mentioned this because you feel it necessary to discount my cross country traveling.

To Kalispell Montana then Yellowstone and then back through Lolo Pass and home should be about 1700 miles.

Yea, I do "cross country" riding. 19,000 miles last year. Oh and by the way, all of that done on the same car tire.

When Mrs M and me drove through Mount Rainier National Park enroute from Seattle to Portland in 2009 I thought at first this would be great to do this on a bike or scooter. Then after a few miles of crawling along behind RV's climbing up the steeper sections I started to change my mind, and this was in October it must be a lot worse for RV's in summer. Then there's the fact you can't look around that much as you're concentrating on the road, and I've found things very much the same riding in the Alps in Austria, and the Pyrenees in France and Spain.

There's one section in the Mount Rainier National Park I remember we descended called the Box Canyon of the Cowlitz, which was scenically lovely, and as you mentioned car tyres, ours and probably hundreds of others were splashed with yellow paint from the road marking they were doing that day.

As for the camping and touring with a trailer, you've explained all that in previous posts. All good stuff but this forum is about the Silver Wing.